EBJ, R EBJ M c. h. stratz, m D. tHe J7cmalc Beauty With 180 Illustrations. AMSTERDAM — AUQUST KOSTER. C. H. STRATZ, M.D. THE FEMALE BEAUTY WITH 180 ILLUSTRATIONS AMSTERDAM AUGUST KOSTER TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page. Introduction 1 I. The modern conception of beauty • 4 II. The presentation of female beauty in sculpture and painting. 13 III. Female beauty in literature 25 IV. The doctrine of proportions and the canon 33 V. Influence of development, nutrition and mode of life on te body 50 VI. Influence of sex, age and heredity 57 VII. Influence of diseases on the bodily form 05 VIII. Influence of dress on the bodily form 76 IX. Appreciation of the body generally, from the given points of view 84 X. Appreciation of the several parts of the body 99 a. The head 99 b. The trunk, as a whole, breast, abdomen, back 122 G'onnection of the trunk with head and limbs, viz. Female neck and shoulders, hips and buttocks 158 c. Upper Limbs, Arm, hand 172 d. Lower Limbs, leg, foot 182 XI. Survey of the conditions of normal bodily formation .... 190 XII. Beauty of colour 195 XIII. Beauty of movement 204 XIV. Practical value of the scientific conception of female beauty . 267 XV. Value in art and art-criticism. — Models 289 XVI. Directions for the maintenance and improvement of female beauty 304 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. Fig. 1. The Vatican Venus. , 2. Falguiere's " La Danseuse *. .3(7 and 36. The Esquiline " Aphrodite diadumene". , 4. Alma Tadema. "A sculptor's model". , 5. A Jewish girl, fifteen years old. , G. Botticelli's Venus. , 7. Portrait of Jeanne d'Aragon in the Louvre. , 8. G. Fritsch's Canon, Merkel's normal figure. „ 9. Female normal figure according to Richer. , 10. Sarpi, a Javanese girl of about eighteen. , 11. Female normal figure according to Hay. , 12. Female normal figure according to Thomson. 13. Sargent's mean figure of the American woman, compared with Fritsch's canon. , 14. Woman with spinal curvature and fiat foot, but correctly proportioned. , 15. Scheme of Fig. 14 compared with Fritsch s canon. , 16. Posterior view of Fig. 14. , 17. Pasteur's Tangent. , 18. Head of a human embryo in the sixth week (after the schema of Gegenbauer and Hackel). , 19. Head of a young Parisian woman, with beautifully shaped mouth. , 20. Little girl with genu valgum, after Hoffa. , 21. Infantilism of a woman, after Meige. „ 22. Munich girl, 12-J years old. , 23. Curve of Heauty. "Beauté du diable". , 24. Girl with manifest signs of having suffered from rachitis. „ 25. Girl with traces of having suffered from rachitis. , 26. " Myopathic primitive progressive", after Londe and Meige. Fig. 27. Young Berlin woman of 26, with powerful developed muscular system. „ 28. Young Dutchwoman of 20, with phthisical habitus. „ 29. Javanese girl vvho has never worn a corset. „ 30. Piaster cast from the corpse of a youthful suicide. , 31. Young Viennese woman, umnarked by furrow due to tightlacing. „ 32. Young Austrian woman, with a pronounced furrow due to tightlacing. , 33. Young woman, with very marked furrow due to tightlacing. , 34. Young woman with furrows below the knee caused by garters. , 35. Symmetrical carriage of the body. , 36. Normal male figure according to Merkel. , 37. Normal female figure, according to Merkel. „ 38. Normal male figure from behind after Merkel. , 39. Normal female figure from behind after Merkel. , 40. Normal female figure. , 41. Normal male figure. , 42. Female and male torso in profile after Thomson. , 43. Female and male skull modified after Ecker. , 44. Head of an embryo in the sixth week. , 45. Skull of a newly borrt child. „ 46. Skull of a woman with a long, narrow upper jaw. , 47. Skull of a woman with a short broad upper jaw. „ 48. Young South-Italian girl of 13. „ 49. Young Samoan woman. , 50. Head of Austrian woman. „ 51. Lady of Valencia. , 52. Viennese girl of 15, with a dimple in the chin, pure facial oval, a soft mouth, beauty-folds over eyes and abundant head of hair. „ 53. Japanese girl with Mongolian fold. , 54. Female head of good proportions and with a well formed eye. , 55. Head of a Moorish woman of 20 from Algiers. „ 56. Beautifully formed ear (after Langer). „ 57. Girl from Schappach. , 58. Head with classic profile. , 59. Two Italian women with Greek profile. , 60. Sevillana. , 61. Skeleton of the trunk of a young woman of 25, deformed by tightlacing (after Rüdinger). , 62 and 63. Alteration of the skeleton of the trunk through tightlacing (after Sommering). , 64. Muscular system of the female torso, from the front. „ 65. Muscular system of the female back. Pig. 66. Posterior view of a man and vvoman (after Ricber) for comparing the distribution of the fat-cushions. „ 67. Austrian girl of 14, witli a good buiging of the breast towards the anterior axillary boundary (on the right side). „ 68. North-German girl of 16 vvith high position of breast. „ 69. Munich girl of 16 with low position of breast. „ 70. Well formed breast. „ 71. Badly formed breast. „ 72. Fully developed breast of a Bohemian "beaute du diable". „ 73. Pemale pelvis. „ 74. Undulating line of the trunk in profile. , 75. Female body with beautiful boundary lines between trunk and legs (an Austrian). „ 76. Round back. , 77. Drooping of the right slioulder at the beginning of spinal cur- vature in a young woman of 23, of Dutch-English origin. , 78. Beautifully modelled back of a Javanese girl. „ 79. Back of a Parisian woman, ftattened by tightlacing. „ 80. Back of a young woman of Scheveningen with well-developed fossal. „ 81. Female head and shoulder in profile. „ 82. Skin folds over the (right) hip, in a bent attitude of the pelvis. „ 83. Profile of Fig. 75, with beautiful hips. „ 84. Rounding off of the hips in a young Viennese woman. „ 85. Girl of 12, with female forms in course of growtli. „ 86. Samoan girl (back view). , 87. First signs of fading. „ 88. Pointed elbows. „ 89. Axis of the arm in pronation and supination. „ 90. Beautifully rounded arm (Munich woman). , 91. Beautifully moulded arm and shoulder (Swabian woman). „ 92. Strong, femininely formed arms and hands of a Viennese girl. „ 93. Viennese girl (Plate I, 3 years later). Perfect moulding of the hands. , 94. Determination of the straightness of the leg after Mikulicz. „ 95. Brücke's line. , 96. Beautifully formed calves and feet. „ 97. Impressions of the normal foot and of flatfoot, after \ olkmann. „ 98. Female body on orange back ground with neutral shadow. „ 99. Female body on violet back ground with neutral shadow. „ 100. Female body on white back ground. „ 101. Female body on black back ground. „ 102. Torso of a girl of 14, with lowered arms. „ 103. Torso of the same girl, with arms raised. Fig. 104. Extension of the Vertebral column through tension of the dorsa museles. Bohemian girl of 18. „ 105. Girl of 14 (Fig. 67) with pelvis tlirust forvvard. „ 106. Girl of 14, with raised diaphragm and indrawn abdomen. , 107. Girl of 14, with extended back and indrawn abdomen in profile. , 108. Extension of trunk supported by extension of leg. Frenchwoman of 24. „ 109. Young woman of 23, of Dutch-French extraction. , 110. Canon of the young woman of mixed race. „ 111. The same young woman with the extremest extension of the trunk. „ 112. Flexion of the trunk first stage. Austrian woman of 20. , 113. Flexion of trunk, second stage. Munich girl of 12. , 114. Flexion of trunk. Third stage. „ 115. Highest stage of Flexion of trunk. Italian girl of 20. „ 116. Red haired Danish woman. „ 117. The same in flexed posture. „ 118. Japanese girl of Kobe in her bath. „ 119a. Bending furrows caused by extension. , 1196. Bending furrows caused by flexion. „ 120. Lateral bending furrows caused by flexion and rotation. , 121. The same furrows caused by strong rotation towards the opposite side. , 122. Pronounced and faulty kinks caused by rotation and flexion towards the left side. „ 123. Three Munich girls of 6, 8 and 10 "standing at ease „ 124. Standing at ease on the entire sole. „ 125. Erect bearing with raising of the heel. , 126. Symmetrical attitude of the body. „ 127. Posture of the hips after Richer. „ 128. Young woman of 20 from the Rhine, in an easy attitude of the hips. „ 129. Proportions of the young Rhine woman. „ 130. Two girls of 16 in hip attitudes. „ 131. Sitting posture with upper part of body inclined and arms lowered. „ 132. Sitting posture with upper part of body extended and arms raised. „ 133. Girl of 13, sitting straddle legs. „ 134. Half-sitting, half-lying position. , 135. Extended dorsal position. Italian woman of 20. „ 136. Flexed dorsal position. Austrian woman of 20. „ 137. Female model in upright attitude with lowered arms. , 138. The same with raised arms. Pig. 139. The same in extended dorsal position. „ 140. The same in tiexed lateral position. „ 141. Italian girl of 13, ï-ecumbent attitude, back view. „ 142. Austrian girl of 18, recumbent attitude, back view. „ 143. Scheme of human gait, according to Richer. „ 144 — 149. Female gait on bare feet I—VI. „ 150. Viennese girl of 18 walking, from behind. „ 151. The same with faulty carriage. „ 152. Girl going upstairs. Back view. „ 153—158. Girl running I—VI. „ 159. Measurement of the Viennese girl in head lengths. „ 160. Measurement of the Viennese girl by Fritsch s modulus. „ 161. Viennese girl of 17, with perfectlv normal proportions. „ 162. The same from behind. „ 163. The same in profile. „ 164. Proportions of the Viennese girl of 17. „ 165. Young woman of 22, from Scheveningen. „ 166. The same stripped. „ 167. Canon of the young Scheveningen woman. , 168. Berlin girl of 17, after a photograph by G. Fritsch. „ 169. The same from behind. „ 170. Margarethe's proportions compared with Fritscb's canon. „ 171. Dioptric outline sketch in head lengths. „ 172. Gustav Eberlein's girl. „ 173. The original of Fig. 172 photographed two months earlier. „ 174. Munich model of 17, with Russian greyhound. „ 175. Berlin model of 20. „ 176. Posterior aspect of Fig. 175. , 177. Proportions of Fig. 175. „ 178. The model Fig. 175 postures by Eberlein. „ 179. The same postured for the posterior aspect. „ 180. Indian "gurita". Introduction. * Des Weibes Leib is ein Gedicht, Das Gott der Herr gesehrieben Ins grosse Stamnibuch der Natur, Als ihn der Geist getrieben." Heine. hoüsasds of poets, painters and sculptors have, from time immemorial, glorified the beauty of' women in word and design, and even serious savants have not hesitated to put forward theories about the ideal of womanly beauty; and the public admire and worship their works. But people forget that almighty Nature, in her inexhaustible strength, produces every dav women who are far more beautiful than anything ever produced by art and science, and vvhom most of them pass by heedlessly, because no connaisseur says to them: "Look! there is beauty " itself in flesh and blood." " Therefore, look diligently at Nature," writes Albrecht Dürer (1), at the beginning of the sixteenth century; " guide yourself by her * and do not depart from her, thinking that you will discover " anything better by yourself; for you will be deceived. For in * truth Art lies hid in Nature: he who can pluck Art from Nature, " possesses Art. If you master Art, it will save you from many " mistakes in your work. But the more your work is in conformity "with life, the better it appears. And this is true; therefore, never " imagine that you can or wish to do anything better than God " has put it in the power of bis creature; for your ability is " po werless bef ore God's creating." (1) Proportionslehre. Tart 111. 1523. 1 Thanks to photography and improvements in the technique of the other reproducing arts, we are to-day in a position to record with scientific accuracy the outward forms, at any rate, of living beauty. Briicke (1) was the first to make use of that medium, and he was followed by Thomson (2). Richer (3), who has published artistic drawings prepared by himself' after the living model, has also secured scientific records of models by means of photography. Now, in these and all similar works published within recent years, that treat of female beauty in a more or less scientific fashion, I have been impressed by two facts, or, rather perhaps, defects. First of all, those works do not deal with the beautiful body as such, but only in relation to the imitations of it in art. Secondly, whilst all anatomical facts are carefullv treated, pathological facts, the bodily changes caused by illnesses and wrong ways of living, are quite superficially dealt with. I have attempted a new wav of judging human beauty by regarding it not only from the standpoint of the artist and anatomist, but also from that of the doctor, by making my observations, not by means of pictures and corpses, but as much as possible by the help of the living body, which I have considered to be of itself the main point of studv, and not to be merelv an object of artistic representation. The reason why I have limited myself to the female body is that, being a women's doctor, l had not sufficiënt male material at my disposal. I have been helped in my investigations by the works of many writers, especially antliropologists, and after fifteen years work, I have come to the conclusion that we can reach a standard, an ideal of beauty, in a negative way, i. e. by excluding morbid influences and all deforniities of the body that are caused by defective clothing, hereditv, unsuitable nourishment and improper ways (1) Schönheit und Fehler der menschlichen Gestal t. 1890. (2) Handbook of Anatomy for Art Students. 1896. (3) Anatomie a r t i s t i q u e. 1890. of living. The standard may indeed, vary a great deal in individual cases, but it is nevertheless always subject to immutable laws; for perfect beauty and perfect health coincide. In this way alone can we attain to a standard firmly based on facts, which we can apply independently of individual taste, at best an uncertain quantity. But 1 believe there is, besides this, a certain practical value in my investigations, since it foliows from them that we are able, especially in the case of growing youth, to increase and esalt bodily health and beauty at one and the saiue time. Still, before I proceed to consider from this new standpoint the known facts, multiplied by my own observations, I must, for the sake of better understanding, roughly sketch the different ways in which attempts have been made, up till now, to reach the ideal of beauty and, particularly, the modern conception of beauty, and to throw critical light on the circumstances that have contributed to its formation. I. Tbc modern Conccption of Beauty. The modern European man knows almost nothing about the living female body. He only sees a woman's face and hands, and, on festal occasions, her arms and shoulders. He only sees one, or quite a few, female bodies in a nude state, and then generally under circumstances that make a sober, impartial verdict impossible or next to impossible; for love blinds a man. He is certainlv able to form an independent opinion about the face and hands, but all he knows about the rest of the body consists in the combined impression of memories of representations of it in sculpture: observations of the living woman play a quite subordinate part with him. Accordingly the modern European's ideal of beauty is mainly based on impressions produced by the medium of art. The artist and the doctor are exceptions to this rule. Goethe, the great psychologist, has excellently described the immediate impression produced by the tirst view of a naked woman s bodv on the spectator. (1) " She then brought me to a small, neatly-furnished room; a " clean carpet covered the floor, in a kind of niche stood a very " clean bed, at the liead of the bed was a toilet-table with a * looking-glass, and, at the foot, a gueridon with a three" branched candlestick, in which beautiful bright candles were (]) Briefe aus der Schweiz. First Part. Cotta 4, p. 469. " burning. On the toilet—table two lights were «ilso burning. A " fire, which had gone out, had warmed the room througli and * through. The old woman offered me a chair opposite the bed * by the mantelpiece and left the room. * Not long afterwards a tall, splendidly-formed, beautiful woman " came out of the opposite door: her clothing did not difter from " the ordinary. She seemed not to notice me, threw off her black " cloak and sat down before the toilet-table. She removed a large " hood, which had covered her face, from her head; beautiful. " regular features showed themselves, brown hair rolled down her " shoulders in large and abundant tresses. She began to undress. * What a wonderful feeling it was as one piece of clothing after " another was taken off, and Nature, released from its alien covering, " appeared strange to me, and, I might say, made almost an awful * impression on me. * Ah, my friend, is it not the same thing with our opinions, our " prejudices, institutions, laws and fantasies? Do we not become k frightened when one of those foreign, irrelevant, untrue environ- * ments is removed from us and any part of our true nature is to * be shown in its nudity? We shudder, we are ashamed. " Let me confess to you. then, that I was bewildered by the " splendid body, when the last covering feil away. W hat do we * see in women ? What kind of women please us, and how is it, "we confuse all our conceptions of them? A small boot looks " pretty, and we exclaimWhat a pretty little foot! A narrow " bodice has something elegant about it, and we praise the beau" tiful figure. " I describe my reflections to you, because I cannot represent to " you in words the series of ravishing pictures, which the beautiful * girl gave me the opportunity of seeing with all modesty and * decency. All her movements followed one the other so naturally, ' and vet they seemed to be so studied. Delightful was she whilst ' she undressed, beautiful, splendidlv beautiful, when the last covering ' feil. She stood, as Minerva might have stood in the presence 'of Paris." The feeling of awe, which Goethe so correctlv indicates, a mixture " appeared strange to me, and, I might say, made almost an awful of' fright at the unaccustoraed sight and a certain sensual excitement, is shared bv the doctor in the case of his first female patiënt, by the artist in that of' his first female model. lt disappears, as soon as the artist sees onlv the beautiful, the doctor the human in woman; and it very rapidly dies away when a man becomes accustomed to see the nude. Nowadays, when even the representatives of the German people have not shrunk from banishing the image of truth from their midst, because it was naked, (1) many are readily disposed to identifv nakedness with immoralitv. But nothing is farther from the truth. It is not nakedness that is immoral, it is the eyes of the spectator. He who only sees the woman in the nude body, who does not get bevond the first sensual inipression, and Iets himself be dominated by it, is immoral and transfers his own imperfections to the object he contemplates. Dress lias nothing to do with moralitv, but only with decency, with fashion. A nudity, which is prescribed by fashion, is never regarded as immoral. Anvbodv, who has happened to live among peoples who are entirelv or partiallv naked, soon becomes aware that clotliing stands in no relation to modesty, and he very soon notices in himself the broadening of his narrow European ideas. Von den Steinen, (2) excellently describes his American impressions in this connection. When I was travelling in the interior of Java in 1890, I met at Singaparna one morning large crowds of women, voung and old, stripped to the waist, who were going to niarket. The first impression was the feeling of awe described by Goethe, which was occasioned by the sight of female nudity in so great a mass in an environment that was new to me. But soon, in spite of many a truly classicallv and beautifullv formed woman s torso, I had a feeling of repulsion in the presence of the many ugly ones, which were exhibited in perfect innocence; and I suddenly understood (1) Before the opening of the new Reichstag building. A. D. 1895. (2) Unter den Naturvölkern Centralbrasiliens, 1894. why most women prefer to cover themselves, if fasliion allows it. Curious are the perversions of the feeling of decency under the pressure of circumstances. A European girl blushes, if she is surprised in her night-dress, but she exhibits herself décolletée at every ball. A woman in a dark-coloured dress feels extremely uncomfortable among ball dresses, just as a man in a morningcoat does among company in evening dress. In Batavia, where all the ladies put their naked feet into small gold-embroidered shoes, it was considered highly improper when a lady appeared in an hotel who had covered her legs with blue satin stockings, and by the very covering attracted attention to that part of her body. A naked child does not blush, when you look at it, but it does when caught telling a lie. A well-brought-up young lady does not easily blush when she is caught in a lie, but does so when a part of her body is bared. Education, so-called, has transferred the feeling of shame from the soul to the body. I think it superfluous to add to the examples l have given, (1) and believe I am right in inferring that our feeling of morality is innate, whilst 011 the other hand our feeling of decency is altogether dependent on the habits and customs prevalent in our environment. We in Europe unconsciously condenin the nude in Nature, whilst in art we liold the representation of it to be legitimate, and continually have it before our eyes. Therefore, as we do not know Nature, we applv to the beauty of the female body the standard which has become familiar to us in works of art. But again, we do not take it into account that the presentation of woman in art is subject to a certain fashion, a tradition, which has nothing to do with the conception of beauty as such, and cannot straiglitway be transferred to actual life. We find the Venus of Milo beautiful as she is. But if she were dressed according to the fashion of today, we should consider lier figure shocking; for her waist would considerably increase in size owing to the clothes. (1) See Ploss-Bartels, Das Weib. 1897. 1, pp. 359 sq. If, then, on the one liand, we consider the Venus of Milo beautiful, and on the other hand a small waist, we must infer from it that all slim women, when unclothed, are ugly, since thev do not possess the perfection of the Venus. Nevertheless, this is not the case, as experience shows. The further conclusion accordingly is, that, even if any one knows the Venus of Milo by heart, he is not in a position, nor is he justified in drawing any conclusion therefrom as to the body of a living clothed woman. But, further, we unconsciously take the old Greek fashions as a Standard for judging modern works of art, and also for judging lif'e in cases in which it confronts us in the nude. I will give only two examples. In the whole of classical art, so far as we know it, there are but two sculptures of a nude man with a moustache, namely " The Dying Gaul" and the Gaul in the Aria and Paetus Group. All the other figures are represented either with a beard or without a beard. It was not the fashion, either among the Greeks or among the Romans, to wear a moustache; in the statues I have named, it is precisely the barbarian who is thereby characterized. In spite of the fact that we see thousands of moustaches evervday of our lives, we hardly ever find them in art, except in portrait-statues. When we meet with moustaches in a man who is at the same time undressed, our feelings are estranged. We see, not the nude, but the undressed man, because—the old Greek fashion condemned moustaches. The presentation of the nude female body is another exaniple. It is alwavs exhibited without any hair on the body. Was this because it is ugly? No, but because it was customary among the old Greeks and Romans, just as it is even now among all Oriental peoples, for women to artificially remove all hair from their body. This is proved by the well-known verses in Martial II and Ovid's Ars Amatoria. There is a further reference to it in the 103rd. song of Bilitis, (1) where it is spoken of as a peculiarity of the (1) Louys, Les chansons de Bilitis, 1897. Heim, Bilitis' s a m m tliche Lieder, 1894. Many people regard the chansons de Bilitis priestesses of Astarte that: —"They never pluck their hairs out, in " order that the goddess's dark triangle may brand their abdomen, * like a teinple." Although the fashion of depilation disappeared from amongst us hundreds of years ago, it has been preserved in Art and thereby transferred to the ideal of beauty among modern men. How uncritically not only the individual man, but also the whole of so-called public opinion is influenced bv outward appearance, may be best seen by a comparison between Fig. I and Fig. 2. Fig. 1 is a reproduction of the Yatican Venus which has been freed from its tin casing (1). Fig. 2 is Falguières well-known portrait-statue of Cléo de Mérode, who is celebrated as one of the most beautiful vvomen living. The statue of Venus answers every requirement we may demand of a normal female body.—In the case of the dancer one remarks the artificially compressed state of the body below the breasts, owing to dress, the faulty position of the breasts, the faulty position of the knees, and the too heavy anklejoint (2). The modern conception of beauty is, therefore, derived from a knowledge of the head, hands and arms which is made possible by daily experience; and, as for the rest of the body, from a collective conception due to art-reproduction of the nude woman. The general opinion as to female beauty is, consequently, not an expert but an indirect one, which creates for itself false and unnatural ideals, through being led astray, on the one hand, by a represent- as a hoax. I refrain from expressing an opinion: buth whether genuine or spurious, they indisputably testify to the author's accurate knowledge of the data of antiquity. (1) It is Michaelis' great merit that the statue became know to the public in this forra. In the Kensington Museum there is a plaster-cast after the original, and there is another piaster cast in Munich. Cf. Bruckmann, Denkmaler griechischer und römischer Plastik, and Springer s Kunstgeschichte, Vol. I. 4th. ed., 1895.—Professor W. Michaelis writes to me: "There is yet another copy, which is a very much more beautiful " piece of workmanship, in the Vatican Magazines, a bronze-cast of which is "in Paris." (2) Cf. L. Pfeiffer, Angewandte Anatomie. 1899. Fig. 1. The Vatican Venus. ation of' the body which is not true to Nature, and, on the other hand, by corsets, boots and dress. All that I have hitherto said cliiefly refers to beauty of form. Fig. 2. Falguière's "La Danseuse". That it is much more difficult to have an objective opinion in relation to beauty of colour, everyone knows who has devoted anv time to the study of the theory of colour and the function ot the human eve: nobody knows it better than women themselves, who instinctively know hovv to lieighten their charms and conceal their blemishes by a proper choice of colours. It is still more difficult to analyse the beauty of movements, most of which are hidden to us by dress. But we must make yet a further limitation. Even the small amount of the female body, that can be seen daily, is not looked at with sufficiënt attention, because the eyes of the spectators are not practised. Let anybody try to picture to himself the features, the hair, the eyes and the hands of persons whom he meets every day. In the great majority of cases he vvill not be able to remember the colour of the hair and eyes, and the shape of the nose and mouth, unless they have left a deep impression on him on account of unusual development. Even the ears, which contribute a good deal to facial expression, are generally very superficially observed; whilst Mantegazza (1) tells us, with respect to the shape of the hands, that even painters did not know whether or not their second finger was longer than their fourth. A quite superficial notice is, in fact, generally taken even of the head, face, and hand. although we are every day able to observe them in considerable numbers; about the remaining parts of the body only a practised observer can draw certain inferences from gait and carriage; but most people are content with indefinite ideas that are derived from a usually superficial contemplation of works of art. In order then properly to understand this element in the modern standpoint, it is our duty to analyse the presentation of female beauty in sculpture and painting. (1) Physiologie des W e i b e s. German translation by Teuscher, 1894, p. 52. II. The Presentation of Female Beauty in Sculpture and Painting. The flourishing period of Greek art has exercised so powerful an influence on tbe modern ideal of beauty, that even accidents of the then fashion have been unconsciously transmitted into it. The art of sculpture indisputably reached its highest point in the time of Phidias, Polycletus and Praxiteles, and it is a question whether it will ever again approach the sarne perfection. It is, therefore, quite natural that the old Greek art should have appealed to all later art epochs as an unsurpassable model. Apart from Greek art, vvhich was followed by a slumber lasting for centuries, we have here to deal especially with the Renaissance. The Oriental elements, which have to be taken into consideration in the history of art, have nothing to do with the form of the female body. Nor has the Japanese influence in art been of such a nature as to deserve mention in this connection. The old Greek art took its subjects directly from life. Neither inclement vveather nor bodily defects caused the ancient inhabitants of Greece to conceal their beautiful forms by dress, and thus the primary condition of creative art was fulfilled: namely, that the artist should be able to make a daily study and comparison of' the different forms of the naked body in its most perfect moulding. By continuous practice of the eye the artist in those tirnes was able to create an ideal image for himself, for the realization of which he had at his disposal the finest models in the greatest profusion. Moreover, the public of those times saw the nude body everv day and were acquainted with it, so that much more could be expected of artistic productions; and such productions were far more expertly appreciated than is to-day the case with a public that is ignorant of the human body. Richer (1) has recently shovvn, with extreme acuteness, how much superior the artistic perception of the old Greek aitists was to that of all their successors. When he speaks about the representation of movement and calls attention to the fact that we, thanks to modern science, are able, by means of instantaneous photography, to record pictorially every single phase of movement, he points out that most of the later artists, following an unconscious tradition, never represented figures walking or running, but always only gliding or falling figures: whilst all the Greek figures, from the Tyrannicides to the Dancing Faun, proved to be accurate reproductions of positions which were perfectly true to nature. Besides their wonderfully keen artistic perception, besides the large number of pre-eminently beautiful models, the Greeks had at their disposal yet a third expedient for ensuring the fidelity to nature of their representations, namely: plaster-casts from life. According to Pliny, (2) Lysicrates was the first to introducé this method into sculpture. Anatoniy was unknovvn to the Greek artists until the Alexandrine school, as Chéreau (3) and Langer (4) have couvincingly proved. Langer points out that the best of the Greek sculptures are those whose subjects are in repose, " whose muscular niechanism is hidden." " On the other hand, in those works of sculpture that represent movement, faults, arising from ignorance, may often be taken exception to. Sometimes the muscular protuberances are incorrectlv grouped, at others they are handled confusedly and without distinction, like folds of the skin and protuberances of the (1) Dialogue suri'artetiascienc e.—L a nouvelle revue. Vol. 107 et S. 19. Année. La revue de 1'art ancien et moderne, 1897, fase. 3 & 4. (2) Quoted by Langer. (3) Dictionnaire encyclopédique des sciences médicales. (4) Anatomie der ausseren For men des nienschlichen Körpers, 1884, p. 30. sq. skeleton. What excites undivided and justifiable wonder in such sculpture, is the movement, and this lies much rather in the arrangement of the bodily parts than in the muscling." In other words, Langer means to say, that, in spite of subordinate anatoinical errors, the general impression of the moving figures is always true to nature: Kicher, as I have already observed, lias proved their truth to nature by direct verification with instantaneous photographs. Now, as moving figures are the most difficult to represent, because it is impossible to fix a model in the desired position, this similarity of opinion among such different judges is a fresh proof of the extraordinary keenness of observation of the ancient artists. (1) But, although the Masters of antiquity vvere able, in spite of their ignorance of anatomy, to produce the most splendid works owing to their artistically-trained perception and the large number of beautiful models at their disposal, yet the aina of their art was by no means an absolute fidelitv to nature in the representation of the human form. We should not forget, that Art among the Greeks was at the service of their religion, which prescribed the subjects for most of the artistic representations, although certainly in greater variety than did the Cbristian religion. The Greek artist, who represented the gods, was therewith compelled to idealise his tigure, and, in so far, to deviate from Nature. That the model played a by no means subordinate part in the transaction is shown by the example of Praxiteles, who, out of gratitude, set up the nude portrait-statue of Phryne in the temple at Thespiae near the Aphrodite; and, contrariwise, this instance proves that it was not a question with the artist of fidelity to nature in the representation even of the most beautiful model; for otherwise, (1) It has struck me that the Japanese artists also observe much more keenly than our artists and ourselves are accustomed to. In European pictures one always sees birds in the act of hovering, never in that of flying. Japanese representations of flying birds, which at first sight appear unnatural to us, are proved, on comparison with instantaneous photographs, to be perfectly true to nature. this act of dedication of the great artist, the juxtaposition of Goddess and Woman, would not be intelligible. What the Greek artist had to arrivé at was. to treat the model suitably to the traditions of the divine tigure that was to be represented, to generalise the individual to a certain extent, and to combine the divine type with the greatest possible fidelity to nature. And not onlv did the religious purpose of the work of art compel the artist to deviate from nature, but so also did the place in which it was destined to stand. If a figure standing on a high pedestal be reproduced according to natural conditions, it has, to the spectator, an appearance of being thickset and is uncomely, a fact which we can verify any day, when we look up at people from 1-ig. 3a. Aphrodite diadumene irom the Ksquiline. below. In such cases, tne artist has to unnaturallv and disproportionatelv increase the longtudinal measurements at the expense of the latitudinal. If we look at the statue from the front, all the nearer parts must seem comparativelv reduced in size, and all the more distant parts enlarged; we can easilv convince ourselves of the fact, by noticing the mistakes that occur in phütographs whichhave been taken from a wrong position. Lastly, a statue which is to be set up in a temple lias to harmonise architecturally witli its surroundings, and is thus dependent on a whole number of laws which may affect the form in the most various ways. The consideration of all those points required great practice and experience, it required the development of a certain systeni atisation of the relations of the several parts of the body, of a doctrine of proportion which, as might be expected and as was confirmed bynumerousmeasurements in later times, by no nieans always corresponds to the proportions of living beings. Sn flip pfprnal fmmnn . . i'ig. 3b. "Aphrodite diadumene" from beauty lives in all ancient the Esquiline. statues, but is nevertheless influenced by tradition, locality and the character of the personalitv to be represented. I will give but one example. Fig. 3 represents the " Aphrodite diadumene " from the Esquiline. Fig. 4 Alma Tadema's well known o " Sculptor's Model." Fig. 5 a fifteen-year-old Jewisli girl who is fairlv normally built. In the first case the legs, which are somewhat too long in proportion to the trunk, show tliat the figure was calculated for a pedestal: the upper part of the body which is bent somewhat backwards is, compared with the abdominal and lumbar region which comes forward, heavily elaborated, the head clearly represents the archaic type and is comparatively larger than is the case in other antique statues. The general impression of the whole figure is tliat of a young girl, half-child, half-woman, in her first bloom, a bud which is not yet quite opened. Alma Tadema, who tried to give in his „ . „ , , , picture the model of the Fig. 4. Alma Tadema. A Sculptor s model". Esquiline Yenus, has leng- thened the whole figure and removed all the convention from it; the proportions of the breast and abdomen are ratlier tliose of a grown-up woman, the navel is lower, the breasts are more strongly developed, the head is smaller; the girl is older and slimmer, and yet her muscular development is not so good and her thorax is not so beautifully formed as in the statue. But in the young Jewess we find approximately the same forms as in the statue, witli the difference that their perfection is due rather to fat than to muscular development. The relations between the head and the rest of the body agree rather with the statue than with Tadema's picture. Apart from the charm of the picture, we must confess that the Greek master could never have made his statue from Tadema's model: the comparison with the living girl teaches us that he had some such half-developed person to work from, but one with a broader chest and stronger muscular development, one of those compact, thoroughly healthy Backfische, who, after they reach their full length, grow into the most Fig. 5. A fifteen-year-old Jewish girl. beautiful wornen. And the size of the head, which is excessive and opposed to the tradition, points to the youthful age of the statue, which, on tliat account, I should not tliink to be that of Aphrodite; if, indeed, it is a goddess at all, it is a very youthtul Psyche. On 14th August 1485, a marble sarcophagus was dug up by some workmen in the Via Appia, which contained the enibalmed corpse of a young girl. She was of wonderful beauty and so well-preserved that she had the appearance of living. (1) So great was the concourse of people to see it that Pope Innocent YI11 had the body secretly taken away and buried, because he feared the effect on his saintly flock of tliis heathen competitor. "But," adds Vachon (2), " it was all very well for the Pope " to bury that woman's flesh, half-living, deep in the earth, to 4 throw that ephemeral flower into the gutter—that flower which * had opened again to the rays of the sun, after a night of several " centuries: antiquity was revived for ever in the marvellous re-birth " of Art, which had preserved from destruction and the grave the " secret of grace and beauty." On the ruins of Classical Art rose the building of the Renaissance: the relics of former greatness becaine a revelation for a new Spring-time of Art. But not a single one of its works bas reached, much less exceeded, the classical beauty, because the richest source of ancient inspiration was sealed to Modern Art: namely, the daily sight of the naked body in thousands of positions, and the sharpening of artistic observation thereby. The best of the later Masters clearly perceived this, and tried to make up for the deficiency by substituting for the intuitive imitation of beautiful forms a scientific, anatomical study of their foundation. Duval and Bical (3) have criticallv and carefully collected, and illustrated with admirable reproductions, the anatomical studies which most of the artists pursued in association with doctors. Among the artists are Leonardo da Vinei, Michel Angelo, Rapliael. Bandinelli, Cellini, Titian, Carracci, Kubens, Rembrandt, Dürer and many others. But if, on the one hand, this extension of their knowledge made (1)Lettre de Bartholomaeus Fontius aFrancescoEllac h e 11 e, translated and analysed by Hubert Janitscheck. L'art, vol IV. (2) La femme dans l'art. 1891, p. 194. (3) L' anatomie des Maitres. Histoire de 1'anatomie plastique. 1890. it possible for the great artists to improve on faulty models in their works, on the other hand, there was the danger that many of thero, seduced by sucli knowledge, would put more into their figures than was really to be seen, would in some measure, outstrip Nature, without making her more beautiful. Even great Masters did not escape (1). If they tried to ward ofï their danger by faithfully imitating Nature, there was the possibility that they might unconsciously transfer defects of the model into their works, and that the more, since they were not all fortunate enough to light on perfectly beautiful models. Not only the artist, however, but also the public, was unaccustomed to a daily view of the nude, and that is the reason why both the artist and the public became less fastidious and were contented with a lesser standard of beauty. The individuality of the artist vanishes more and more into the background, and whole generations may be blinded, by great improvements in technique or conception, to intentional and unintentional faults of another kind. It is not my purpose to give here a detailed criticism of the Art and Art-history of the Renaissance; it is sufficiënt for my aim to show by an example, how even connaisseurs may be led to erroneous conceptions through the prevailing current of opinion. I will take, for instance, the Florentine Venus of Sandro Botticelli, which in recent times has been awarded the throne of beauty by the Pre-Raphaelites with unanimous admiration. Brücke has already called attention to some anatomical faults in it (l c. pp. 25, 62, 81). Ullman, one of the best of Botticelli's biographers, also admits the anatomical errors to be such. He quotes the verses of Poliziano, which were probablv the basis of the picture, he debates thoroughly and in detail the possibility that Simonetta Catanea, the beloved of Guiliano di Medici, served as model for the Venus, and decides in the negative, because the only (IJ Cf. Henke, Die Menschen des Michel Angelo im Vergleich m i t der A n t i k e. Kostock. 1892. authentic portrait of Simonetta does not altogether tally with the face of the Venus (1). Compare with this Ernst Steinmann's lucubration: (2) " Frau Schönheit i9t's, Von deren Lobgesang Noch zittert Herz und Hand, Die du so oft erkannt Am (liegend goldnen Haar, Am flatternden Gewand." " In these verses frem a hymn to beauty by Rossetti the poetic magie, that clings to the birth of foam-born Aphrodite, is perhaps for the first time expressed in words. The billows, gently splashing, lapround the tossing bark, on the edcfe of which stands the fascinating goddess of love, covering her breast and lap with a chaste gesture. An endless abundance of golden hair flows ai'ound the Heavenly One This figure has rightly been esteemed to be the most beautiful Fig. 6. Venus of Botticelli. picture of Venus in later art: it can, in fact, only be compared (1) Ullman, Botticelli, p. 102. (2) Knackfuss, Künstlermonographien, 24, 1897. with the sleeping Venus of Giorgione, in which the purity of soul, that has taken up its abode in the chaste form of a perfectly beautiful woman, similarly delights us. This picture appeals to us like a saying from the golden age which Marsilio Ficino has described in his letters with such glowing colours. In' its presence the spectator feels as though he were an uninvited witness of one of the holy mysteries, which Nature has hidden in the great book of her wonders. With such reality is this incident reproduced, so vivid is the effect of the maidenly charm of the breathing goddess " etc., etc. The whole of this expectoration, from which I have omitted everything not directly hearing on the Venus, is made yet more superfluous by the picture accompanying it. Should Art-history be written like that? I think not. I should like to contrast this tirade with the following facts. Sandro Botticelli's figure of Venus is filled with a tender, sad charm, which makes a deep impression. If you look closely, you find in the long, narrow throat, the sloping shoulders, the narrow sunken chest, the low position of the breasts and the smallness of the distance between them caused by it, the well-stamped type of the consumptive, which, both in life and in pictorial representation, excites the deep sympathy of the spectator by its sorrowful beauty. When we consider that Simonetta Catanea was bom in 1453, and, after marrying Marco Vespucci in 1468, died of consumption in 1476, when she was not yet 23, it is more than probable that, as some writers believe, she reallv stood as model for Botticelli's Venus, and that the artist, from motives that are easy to understand, only altered the face a little. (1) Botticelli therefore, made his ideal out of the type of a beautiful consumptive woman, without knowing it. His admirers and followers also did not know it, and, striving after his ideal, they gave their healthy (1) In the portrait of Simonetta by Pollajuolo in the Duc d'Aumale's collection, the upper part of her body, which is nude as far as beneath her breasts, shows, in spite of its great beauty, every sign of consumption. (Engraving by de Mare in the Gazette des Beaux Arts, XXII). models the appearance of consumption and so created unreal hybrid figures. The conflict is especiallv clear in Burne-Jones, one of the greatest Pre-Raphaelites. In his Artstudies there are healthy human beings (1), in his paintings they have all become more or less consumptive. This single e.xample may suffice to show hovv, in the later Art-works, Nature and Art are involved in the most complicated relations. In order to be just to an artist, you must not only analyse with extreme care his works, hut also his life and the times in which he lived, and you will, even then, seldom succeed in distilling therefrom a passable ideal of beauty. The more we are able to find in actual life figures similar to subjects in works of Art, the more probable it is that the artist confined himself entirely to beauty in the life; and in this respect the nude female figures of Titian, Giorgione, Palma Vecchio and Van Dyck stand first. Rembrandt and Rubens are their equals in truth to nature, but neither of them had such beautiful models. We may measure the influence of the great artists on the modern ideal of beauty, by asking which are the works that are most widely known ? Tliey are indisputably the Yenus of Milo, the Venus of Medici, the Sixtine Madonna, (2) and the Madonna della sedia. We thus see that the classical art is even nowadays triumphant in regard to the female body, and that, of all later artists, Raphael was the only one who knew how to exalt the charming face of his Madonnas to a generally acknowledged ideal. And, in another way, we also see that * the great majority " are a stern and just judge and know very well how to distinguish the truly beautiful from the mean and mediocre. In Art, as in history, the best and least prejudiced connaisseur is posterity. (1) Cf. Studio, vol VII. p. 198 sq: and vol. XIV, p. 38. (2) Jelinek (Monographie: Madonna Sixtina, 1899) has with good reason doubted the genuineness of the Dresden Sixtina. If he is right, it only proves afresh the great power of the original, which could produce so profound an impression even in a faulty copy. m. Female Beauty in Literature. The representation of female beauty in literature may be viewed both from the artistic and from the purely scientific standpoint. The artistic standpoint has been dealt with bv Lessing in his "Laocoon", in which he defines the limits of what can be represented in painting and poetry (1). " Homer savs nothing about Helen except that she had white arms and beautiful hair. He paints her beauty by describing the impression she makes on the assembled old Trojans. Zeuxis painted her: his picture consisted solelv in the figure of Helen, who stood nude. " According to Lessing's theory the poet should substit.ute the look and the smile for the eyes and the mouth, should describe movements instead of slender limbs, and, instead of bodily beauty, the impression it produces. If the poet wishes to represent the beautiful points of a body, he should not describe tliem themselves, but the act of undressing which reveals them, or the impression they make on the spectator. Goethe's description of a girl undressing, which I have already given, may serve as a pattern. He says nothing about her body, except that the moulding of her face was beautiful and regular, and that her brown hair feil down her shoulders in long, thick tresses; no other parts of the body are mentioned. That they are beautiful, we divine from the impression they made on the wonderstruck spectator whilst she undressed. A painter would have had to represent, not the astonished vouth, but, like /euxis, the unclothed beauty. Another interesting example, which is treated of by two poets, is afforded by the well-known story of beautiful Ginevra. In Boccaccio, (2) Ambrogiuolo steps out of his chest in Ginevra's (1) Lessing, Gesammelte Werke, Cotta, 1886, II, p. 6*20 sq. (2) D e c a m e r o n, 2nd day, Ninth story. bed chamber and takes stock of the room. " Then he approached the bed, and savv that the lady and her young servant were in a deep sleep. He drew the covering off her body, and perceived that she was as beautiful naked as when dressed. He sought for a mark on her body, and at last found under her left breast a small mole, on which were a few golden hairs. And although, as he gazed at her beauty, an irresistible desire came upon him to kiss her and to enjoy her love, he covered her up again carefully, because he feared her anger". Shakespeare has dealt with the same scene in Cymbeline(l). Imogen sleeps. Iachimo comes from thetrunk. Iachimo. " Cytherea, How bravely thou becoms't tby bed! fresh lily! And whiter than the sheets! That I might touch! But kiss; one kiss!—Rubies unparagon'd, How dearly they do't!—'Tis her breathing that Perfumes the chamber thus: the flame o' the taper Bows toward her; and would under-peep her lids, To see th' enclosèd lights, now canopied Under these windows, white and azure, lac'd With blue of heaven's own tinct.—But my design's To note the chamber: I will write all down :— Such and such pictures;—there the window;—such Th' adornment of her bed;—the arras, figures, Why, such and such;—and the contents o' the story,— Ah, but some natural notes about her body, Above ten thousand meaner movables Would testify, t'enrich mine inventory:— O sleep, thou ape of death, lie dull upon her! And be her sense but as a monument, Thus in a chapel lying!—Come off, come otf;— [Taking off her bracelet] " On her left breast A mole cinque-spotted, like the crimson drops I' the bottom of a cowslip; here's a voucher Stronger than ever law could make* (1) Act. II, Scene 2. Boccaccio describes exclusively the impression of beauty. The reader can only guess from the golden hairs about the mole that Ginevra was blonde. Shakespeare only mentions the * fresh lily" colour, the " rubies unparagon'd" of the mouth and the bluish shade of the closed eyelids. Both of them are even more sparing than Goethe in the description of the body, but they depict all the more strongly the passions aroused by the sight of the naked beauty. In the poems of Bilitis an undressing-scene is handled with much skill, and a different artifice is used. The song in question (132) may be freely rendered as follows: — Blumentanz. " Anthis, die lydische Tanzerin, Ist in sieben Schleier gehüllt. Sie wirft den gel ben Schleier hin, Dem schwartzes Gelock enlquillt. Der rosige Schleier gleitet vom Mund, Der w eis se enthüllet die Arme zur Stund. Den rothen Schleier knüpfet sie ab, Der den sprossenden Busen entblösst, Der grüne sinkt von den Hüften herab, Von den Schultern der blaue, gelost. Doch den durchsichtig'n Schleier der Lenden. Bedeckt sie mit schamhaften Handen. " Man bittet. Sie wirft das Haupt zurück ; Doch wie nun die Floten erschallen, Zerreisst sie den Schleier Stück für Stück, Lasst ihn, den letzten, fallen. Dann, singend zum Tanze, pfiücket sie ab Die Blüthen des Leibes, die Gott ihr gab. 'Was ist meine knospende Rose? Die Brust. 'Was sind meine Veilchen'? Die Augen voll Lust. 'Die rothe Nelke? Mein küssender Mund; 'Die LilieV Mein Leib, so blühend und rund. 'O pfiücket, bevor sie verwelken, ' Die Rosen, die Veilchen, die Nelken.' " Here too, nothing is said of the several parts of the body, except that the hair is black and the breasts are small. That the eyes are blue and the mouth red is shown by the comparison with the violet and the carnation- The rest of the body is mentioned, not described. I am convinced that Lessing's artistic standpoint is the correct one, and I cannot help concluding with him that the best literary works chiefly affect the reader's imagination and are, therefore, the least calculated to give us a picture which we can directly compare with living reality ; the aim of the poet, when he praises beauty, is that every reader should imagine to himself he sees his own ladv-love or the woman whose bodily charms have made the deepest impression on him. And now we must turn altogether aside from the artistic point of view. If we place ourselves at the purely scientific standpoint, entirely disregard literary worth, and limit ourselves to the establishing of facts, many quite insigiiificant poetic productions have a certain value for our purpose, in so far as, on the one hand, they mirror the standard of female beauty that obtained in the vvriter's time, and as on the other, they are a criterion for a certain direction of taste in the conception of beauty. Research of that kind has a higher value in that, as experience shows, the fashion, that dominates poetry, alwavs similarly dominates painting and sculpture at the same time, so that we can discover the ideal of beauty at any given period botli in word and in picture. When Martial declares that the female breast should be such "ut capiat nostra tegatque manus", we may infer that in his time large breasts were not esteemed beautiful. We also find small breasts represented in all classical statues of women. We should never consider a girl with a regular swan's-neck and a regular wasp-waist beautiful: but such pictures teach us that a long neck and a narrow middle were once held to be attributes of the ideal beauty, and in a certain sense they are still. A glance at family portraits from the first half of last century, or at Gavarni's beautiful drawings teaches us further, that painting and sculpture obey the same conception. Houdoy (1), in a masterly work, has scientifically analised in this manner the ideal of beauty from the twelfth till the sixteenth century. Vachon (2), Ploss-Bartels (3), Mantegazza (4), Schaeffer (5), and many others have followed him. There is sufficiënt material in the art and literature of all peoples to build up an ideal of beaty of the civilised world, with all the variations of it that have been occasioned by epoch and trend of taste, even as Houdoy has done it for the later Middle Ages. But such a work would go far beyond the scope of this book, so I refer the reader to the authors I have quoted, and content myself with asserting that, in literature as in sculpture and painting, the ideal of beauty rests on observation of life, which always undergoes changes that are determined by fashion and artistic conception. That literary works may influence the prevailing conception of female beauty, is shown by the example of Rousseau, who by his E m i 1 e caused many of his feinale contemporaries to suckle their own children, and so brought it into fashion that full breasts were regarded as beautiful. Of the thousand descriptions of female beauty that occur in literature, I will give only one example which I take from Houdoy's book. I make this selection, firstly, because there is a portrait of the original in existence to compare with it, secondly, because there is in it a Standard for the judgment of female beauty, which we have not considered up till now, and which imperceptibly leads to the further development of our theme. It is Niphus' description of Giovanna d'Aragona, whose portrait, painted by Raphael or more probably by Giulio Romano (6), hangs in the Louvre in Paris. (1)La beauté des femmes dans la littérature et dans 1'art du XITe au XVIe siècle, 1876. (2) La femme dans 1' a r t. (3) Das weibliche Schönheitsideal in Das Weib, etc. (4) Physiologie des Weibes, etc. (5) Die Fr au in der venezianischen Malerei. Bruckmann, 1899. (6) The Gazette des bèaux arts, XXII, 465 points to historical docu- Houdoy gives Niphus' original Latin text side by side witli an excellent French translation. * The exalted Joanna is a proof that true beauty exists only in Nature; for she unites a perfect beauty of body and mind. " Her soul combines moral heroic greatness with gentleness (and in the latter lies precisely beauty of soul), so that she appears to be not of earthly but of heavenly descent. " The forms of her body are of such pre-eminent beauty, that even Zeuxis, who, in order to represent Helen, was compelled to unite the different charms of the most lovely maidens of Croton, would have been content with Joanna for his sole model, if he had had the honour of beholding her and recognising lier excellence. " Her figure is of medium stature, straight and delicate, adorned with the most marvellously well-proportioned limbs; she seems neither fat nor bony, but has a youthful fullness (succulenta); the colour of her skin is not pale, but plays from white to red; her long hair glistens like gold. Her ears are small and round, corresponding to the mouth (1). Small dark-brown liairs, not too thicklv clustered, arch in a half-circle tovvards the brows; her bluisli eyes shine brighter than any stars beneath the black, straight eye-lashes, and spread charm and joy around; the level and beautifully-formed nose descends straight from between the eyebrows; the little valley, that separates the nose from the upper lip, is of divine form. The small, sweetly-smiling mouth attracts kisses more than a magnet does iron; soft lips, honey-sweet and coral-red, surround it. The teeth are small, shilling like ivory and beautifully regular; her breath is the most precious perfume. * Her god-like voice has nothing human in it. A pretty dimple adorns the chin: on her cheeks plays the colour of the rose and of snow. The outline of her countenance is round, inclining to the masculine. " The straight, long neck rears itself full and white between the ments as a reason why Raphael could never have seen Giovanna, and only superintended Romano's work. (1) According to Agrippa, the ears combined should constitute a eircle, which should correspond to the size of the open mouth. glistening, well-arched shouldei-s whicli, in a broad surface, allow no bones to protrude. The moderately large breasts are equally rounded and resemble peaches, whose aroma they exhale. " The white hands are outwardly like snow, inwardly like ivory, and exactly as long as the face; the full, round fingers are not too short and have fine, arched nails of delicate tint. " The form of the upper part of the body is in general that of an inverted, rather flat pear, whose lower end is on the average narrow and round, and whose broad upper end is attached in wonderful lines and surfaces to the root of the neck. " The abdomen is flatly moulded and in good proportion to the hips and loins. The thighs are strong and perfectly round: the thigh stands to the calf, the calf to the upper arm, in the correct proportion of three to two. (1) " The arms are formed in divine proportion to the other parts of the body. " The feet are delicate and end in marvellously shaped toes. " The regularity of her build and her beauty are such that she may justly be reckoned among the immortal. " As, then, the spiritual properties, the cliarm and the beauty of this princess are so great, it may be inferred not only that the truly beautiful exists nowhere but in Nature, but also that nothing surpasses the human body in beauty." Better and quicker than this description does the more discreet portrait of Jeanne d'Aragon in the Louvre convince us of her bodily charms (Fig. 7.) YVhether old Niphus was able to study them practically as well as theoretically, is a secondary matter. (2) The main point is that he strives to persuade us of Jeanne's beauty not merely by an enumeration and description of the several parts of her body, but also by a comparison with a certain Standard, by the proportions of the parts among themselves. (1) That is, the circumference of the thigh=one and a half times the circumference of the calf; and the circumference of the calf=one and a half times the circumference of the upper arm. (2) Guyon (Diverses 1 e f o n s. III) points out that Niphus had, as doctor, frequent opportunities of seeing the body of the princess. He therewitli initiates the transition from the conception of the poet to that of the philosopher, who desires not only to evoke Fig. 7. Portrait of Jeanne d'Aragon in the Louvre. and represent an impression, but also to give the grounds for it. The theoretical considerations, vvhich gentlemen without knowledge of life have invented in their studies, have very little value for us. When Schopenhauer talks of the " short, narrow- shouldered, broad-hipped, and short-legged sexwhich is called beautiful, it only shows that his experiences of it were few and unhappy, and therefore he could not study it without bias. There has been no lack of attempts to divide the various forms of female beauty systematically: artists, philosophers and aesthetes have competed together in the endeavour. A. Walker (1) distinguishes three forms: locomotive, nutritive and mental beauty, and suggests as the type for the first Diana, for the second Venus, for the third Minerva. Lairesse (2) writes: "The beauty of a nude woman's portrait consists therein that, in the first place, the masses of the limbs are well-formed, secondly, that she has a beautiful, free and easy movement, and lastly a healthy and fresli colour." Others again differentiate between beauty which is noble or pretty, moral or sensiial, blonde or brunette. None of such divisions goes bevond the attempt and none of them is universally recognised. The onlv positive fact that has been evolved from all these attempts is the striving to discover a certain normality in form, in the relations of single parts to one another in respect of size, in fine, the doctrine of proportions. IV. The Doctrine of Proportions and the Canon. We have already seen that Niphus partly judged the beauty of Joanna of Aragon according to certain relations: the ears taken together are ecjual in size to the mouth, the hand accurately answers the Jength of the face, and the thighs, calt and uppei arm are in a ratio of 3 to 2 etc. (1)Analysis and c 1 a s s i f i c a t i o n of beauty in woman. London, 1852. (2) Groot schilderboek. Amsterdam, 1716. 3 Since the gray age of the Egyptians up to our own