Onderstaande tekst is niet 100% betrouwbaar

533

§ 290.

I have come to the conclusion that this idea is erroneons and ihÜ

at thl S 0f War' hetTnu PerS°nS who were in enemy i rSurv at bTS? 68 "f™ WhiGh thC ^ CoUrt acted mor« than

SïSS.SSSe f r * ^^ ^S ^ bCen towardsTrXation r7e ^ 7;elyd° rth!laWS °f Wa5 • y ■ But I am glad to think that the old

So^auïïJvH^T" y.LOTd St°WeU is suffident to

of waf ï lndmduals who may have been overtaken by the hurricane

or RrS -f . he outbreak war a non-enemy, be he neutral merdv tiXil^l Z ^^ent, Pro™Ptly doses nis' business and ene™ Ït t necessary to remove his own property from the enemy country I think he is entitled to do so. He givefnoa£To the

BrSh ?o TI116 CfUrt no attempt be made by a

Bul^aatoallv thrr^ ^^t illidt trading with the enemy. mant a^ïti J? 7 ^ °f Pr°°f mUSt rest on the shouldets of the daimant, and untd he discharges that burden his goods will be in jeopardy "

Par ces motifs, la Cour d'Alexandrie accorda aux réclamants un

Sluiten